stats

DGPEAKE@AOL.COM DGPEAKE@AOL.COM
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:31:50 EDT


In a message dated 10/24/99 6:55:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
musicmasters@worldnet.att.net writes:

<< 
 True (I've heard this about California).  I had a potential client call me
 in 1996 and balk at my $60 to $75 tunings here in Austin claiming that San
 Francisco only charged $35 to $50 for tuning.  I explained that I was about
 $10 less than the prevailing local rate.  Ironically, when I mentioned that
 other stores may know someone (an apprentice perhaps ) that may work for
 that $35 to $50 rate here, the client "BLEW-UP" and yelled, "I'm a Medical
 Doctor.  I can 'afford' anyone I want.  If I want the best I pay for the
 best!"
 
 I thought about it for a second and said, "You're right.  If you want 'me',
 my rate just went up $10."  I now charge $70 to $100  (base tuning vs pitch
 raise plus tuning).
 
 He hung up on me in a huff.  But, I'm really glad that I didn't compremise
 myself to him.  I'm even more glad that I now charge the prevailing rate
 here in Austin, TX.
 
 Cheers,
 Brian Henselman, RPT
 
 
  >>

My response to all this price comparing is to charge what you are comfortable 
in charging.  I stay busy at the prices I charge, and never, never, lower it 
just to get another tuning.  My prices are competitive though.

Dave Peake, RPT
Portland Chapter
Oregon City, OR


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC