In a message dated 9/07/1999 6:42:49 PM, tcole@cruzio.com writes: << I could see overtorquing at the factory as a cause. But why Steinway, during a time considered to be the zenith of their history, and not a lesser brand? >> Tom; I don't know...... this is part of my puzzlement.................. but it did not needfully have to be a bellyman of course, it could have been a tuner at some other time in the life of the instrument. Out of all the broken/failed agraffes I have replaced I can only remember one that was broken at the string holes. All the rest were broken at the top of the threads and displayed signs of a circular failure (my observation and deduction, no proof). This includes pianos other than S&S. But to answer your question as to why at that point in time for S&S.........??????????? Y'all must go higher than me my son :-) Jim Bryant (FL)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC