This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Richard Brekne=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: December 04, 2001 7:42 AM Subject: Re: Negative bearing (long) Richard Brekne wrote:=20 :)... got your second note on this and thankyou for it. As I = understand it, you disagree with Wogram about the predicatility of the = change after loading, hence modal analysis on an unloaded board is not = usefull. Secondly the process of executing an analysis on a loaded board = is so costly that its largely not practical. Is this correct ?=20 Well, you have to define 'costly' in perspective. For me to do this = right now without a paying client, yes. I would be very costly. For a = company grossing $175,000,000 per year? No. That company should have an = R&D budget more than adequate to afford this kind of research. Consider = how many cars are totalled and/or tested to death before a new model = comes out. Every thriving industry supports research and development of = some kind. Only industries planning on becoming obsolete do nothing. I would like to know your reasoning for disagreeing with Wogram, tho. = It would be good for me to re-read the article again with your thoughts = in mind.=20 As I said, "I don't know enough of the details of his work to have even = the vaguest notion of what all might be different." My experience = indicates there are enough differences to be significant to one = attempting to design, or redesign, a soundboard. Del ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/19/50/58/a7/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC