Paul: I've gone to 3:1 lacquer on Steinway hammers for the reasons you describe--I always needed two passes with 4:1. (of course, it depends on the lacquer you use and the solids content. I am currently using Maclac clear gloss high solids lacquer diluted with acetone). The sets tend to be week starting around f, f#, g in the 5th octave and I usually thouroughly saturate the hammers from there up. Two or even three applications in this area is not unusual. Often the top of the piano will need an additional application. Going down in the tenor I have started to apply the lacquer from the side so that I can get it under the strike point (I find that unless the lacquer gets under the strike point it is relatively useless--shoulder applications that stay out on the shoulders make no difference). I apply the lacquer from both sides and keep it 1-2mm away from the strike point with the gap getting larger as I go toward the tenor/bass break. (I spent some time experimenting with the side application to get a feel for the amount needed for the proper penetration. I would make an application from both sides, wait a minute or two and then cut the hammer open to see if it penetrated all the way to the center.) Going down in the bass I keep the lacquer away from the strike point in the upper bass but let it creep closer in the lower bass, especially the monochords. I find that going in through the side allows me to get the lacquer where I want it without it leeching to the crown where I often don't want it. If I have a concert piano and want to get a little more bite, I will put a thin line across the crown (you need a small applicator for that). If I then have notes that are too loud on a hard blow in the tenor or bass, I insert a needle straight down into the strike point going fairly deep. I try to listen to each string and address them individually if there is a noticable difference. I am more cautious bringing down loud notes in the treble, testing each string of each trichord, being careful not to kill the note. I always file off the bass side corner of the hammer to avoid pinging with the shift pedal and refine at different levels with shallow needling in the crown. David Love >From: Yardarm103669107@AOL.COM >Reply-To: pianotech@ptg.org >To: pianotech@ptg.org >Subject: Re: Ronsen hammers: was Chickering rebuild -- touchweight. >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:03:28 EST > >David: >Ditto. I have always used SW hammers on SW, and after shaping, working on >the >shoulders of all of the hammers with lacquer. But the first shaping makes a >huge difference before any chemicals. The quality of tone generation I get >with that shaping pretty much tells me how much and where to concentrate my >efforts. With SW, I have found that I need at least two passes with 4:1 to >get close to where I want to be. From there it's spot application, >sometimes >groups; then evening everything out. I always go back over the hammer tops >with very fine paper to get rid of the felt raised by the lacquer >application. Also, for attack, I apply a couple of drops of acetone >(actually >the solution from Pianotek works just fine) directly on the strike point, >then shallow needle for evenness. Thanks for your responses. >Paul _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC