I am trying to optimize plate height and location in a small grand. I have no idea where the plate was originally (plate was not in piano when I got it). The thing was apparently installed originally too high and shifted over toward the bass end. The only area I am not sure what is the best comprimize is up at note 88 (of course!). Having pushed the plate all the way forward in the case, I have a speaking length of 52 mm and a strike point about 9.5 mm from the termination point at the capo. If needed, I can slide the plate toward the rear about 5 mm, which would then give me a speaking length of 47 mm and a hammer strike point about 4.5 mm from the capo. I probably could move the action a little bit, but I am pretty sure that the action is sitting where it was supposed to, or at least where it originally did - and I'm not sure how it would work with the fallboard - I have about a 3 mm gap between the keyslip and the key front. Anyone have any input on whether I should go with a 52 mm or a 47 mm speaking length? Or best way for me to decide? If it is likely that the 52 mm speaking length and 9.5 mm strike point combo is right in the typically good functioning ballpark, I'd rather stick with that - it will be easiest for me. Any input? Terry Farrell Piano Tuning & Service Tampa, Florida mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC