Well then I both suggest you read again... because there is no way in reasonable seas that my words could be interpreted these ways. In fact Mr Fandrich, I said exactly the opposite, along with my point in the last sentence. I fail to see that it should be so difficult to understand from my post. Delwin D Fandrich wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: November 07, 2001 7:16 AM > Subject: Re: Tuned front duplexes > > > Ron Nossaman wrote: > > > > > >Well, I have seen a demonstration on three occasions now where a > Steinway > > > D and > > > >a Yamaha CFIII have been on the same stage, and 20 meters back or more > the > > > >Yamaha fades out and becomes difuse... especially the bass sounds like > a > > > >mesh of > > > >foggieness... The Steinway on the other hand pierces through the air > crisp and > > > >clear, and the bass is thundererous in comparison. . Now this does'nt > > > >neccessarilly have to do directly with the front duplex issue, but I > have no > > > >doubt in my mind that carrying power is real enough. > > > >-- > > > >Richard Brekne > > > > > > I suspect you're right Richard, that tuned front duplex in the bass > > > probably doesn't have much to do with it. > > > > > > Ron N > > > > Grin.... thats quite an amusing misread of my words... but then you did > that on > > poipose didnt you...?? > > > > Then I misread as well. I don't see how tuned front duplexes have much to do > with "and the bass is thunderous in comparison." Since both pianos > supposedly have tuned front duplexes, just what was the point? > > Del -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC