Sxuse me... looks like we both made that type error... SWR of 5.3 and medium heavy SW range goes together perfectly.... 0.53 of course is nonsensical for a SWR figure. RicB David Love wrote: > SWR at .53 doesn't make sense. That number usually ranges from 5 - 7. > > David Love > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: November 09, 2001 1:33 AM > Subject: Re: YC Strike Weights etc > > > David Love wrote: > > > > > By setting all the key ratios at .53 do you actually get uniform SWR in > such > > > a case, or does the difference between the contact points on the wippen > heal > > > with varied capstan lines throw that off a bit. If you are trying to > get > > > uniform SWR, wouldn't the key ratio between sharps and naturals have to > be > > > slightly different? > > > > > > David Love > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > I dont think he said he was setting all the key ratios at 0.53 (correct me > if I > > am wrong David) He is setting a new Strike Weight ratio at 0.53 and thats > > something different. What Key Ratio he hasnt said, tho he did mention > that the > > capstans / heels are staggered. > > > > I sometimes have to read twice or thrice to make sure whether David is > refering > > to the Key Ratio, or the Strike Weight Ratio. > > > > > > -- > > Richard Brekne > > RPT, N.P.T.F. > > Bergen, Norway > > mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no > > > > -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC