Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner

[Greg T]

There's an idea...thanks John.

Best,
Greg

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Ross" <jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner


> Hi Greg,
> Try Radio Shack.
> Regards,
> John M. Ross
> Windsor, Nova Scotia.
> jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg T" <Tunapiana440@cox.net>
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner
>
>
> > John,
> >
> > I am very happy with the SOT I have. It has all the features I need. It
> just
> > needs a battery that will hold a charge for more than 2-3 hours...; )
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Greg
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Ross" <jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca>
> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner
> >
> >
> > > Actually, I think the SOT that had the 6V battery, was a modification,
> > made
> > > by Tuners Supply.
> > > I think there was a legal case between, Inventronics and Tuners
Supply,
> > > which died when Tuners Supply, went under.
> > > I started out with a SOT, that had two 9V batteries, and I have
upgraded
> a
> > > couple of times. I now have the SATlll, and am well satisfied, and
never
> > > regretted, the upgrading. The SATlll, does all, I require,
> > > in fact, I do not utilize half of it's potential.
> > > However, if I was younger, I would be tempted to try the Verituner.
> > > Regards,
> > > John M. Ross
> > > Windsor, Nova Scotia.
> > > jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Greg T" <Tunapiana440@cox.net>
> > > To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:53 PM
> > > Subject: Update to: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner
> > >
> > >
> > > > OK...I called Inventronics. The woman who answered the phone said th
ey
> > > have
> > > > nothing at all to do with the Hale SOT. She said I could send it to
> > > Richard
> > > > Wineberger as he advertises in the Journal as someone who repairs
> them.
> > > So,
> > > > I explained that there is nothing wrong with mine but that I just
need
> a
> > > new
> > > > battery and wanted to find a schematic for it in case I encountered
> > > problems
> > > > with it in the future. She then proceeded to tell me (with a slight
> > > > "attitude" detected in her voice) that I shouldn't really be fooling
> > > around
> > > > with a device that old anyway (basically bad-mouthing their own
> product)
> > > and
> > > > that the new Accu-Tuner was the most accurate instrument around now
> > > anyway.
> > > > She said that it probably would be the last tuning device I would
ever
> > > need
> > > > to buy...for $1700.00...
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, maam, I don't THINK so...
> > > >
> > > > I was able to find a battery for it. I guess I won't worry about the
> > > > schematics.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to all who have tried to assist.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Greg
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "J Patrick Draine" <draine@attbi.com>
> > > > To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> > > > Cc: "J Patrick Draine" <draine@attbi.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:35 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Schematics wanted for Hale Sight-O-Tuner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 12:31 PM, Greg T wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the info. If I had known that I would have searched
the
> > > > > > Inventronics site first...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However...since reading your (Patricks) reply I did pay a visit
to
> > > > > > Inventronics website and I cannot find a phone number or email
> > address
> > > > > > where I could contact Al Sanderson...
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Inventronics: 1-800-FAST-440
> > > > > 978 256 7374
> > > > > inventrncs@aol.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>