Ron Nossaman wrote: > >Richard, Ron > > I have never seen any postings that indicate Richard has no use for > >physics. > >Although we may sometimes disagree on the conclusions drawn or the > >appropriate use of > >physical methods surely it is not necessary to be dismissive in what is, > >supposedly, a > >forum for discussion. > >Regards, Robin Hufford > > Robin, > 1/18/2002, Richard wrote > > Actually, I think its time we all made a concerted effort to leave High School > physics behind as much and as quickly as possible. > > I disagreed at that time, and still do. > > Ron N Grin... Oooo thats a good one Ron... wayyyyy out of context to begin with, and even so.... these words of mine convey to your mind that I have no use for physics... period eh ??? No matter... like I said, its no problem to dissagree, its no problem to be wrong.... and it sure as heck shouldnt be a problem to be right....even partly... none of that means a hoot. At least not if one has any pedogogic hopes and dreams for this kind of forum. In anycase not any where in the present thread have I offered even one tiny piece of criticism towards either yours or Dels topic related standpoints... quite the opposite really.... I said something about Dels impressive arguments. All I said was it would be nice to hear from M&H what their position to all this is, and I posted a web site for everyones edification. I fail to see why that inquisitivness should result in the recent totally off topic tangents to this thread. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC