Hi ROn, Don't remember the sequence now. I could look it up but why bother? Why do things have to be so complicated? Oh, for the simple life of the ignorant. I think I was happier whey i didn't know so much. :) Have a great Friday. Newton Ron Nossaman wrote: > > >Now I have a question. I have changed hammers on an S&S B. The > >originals, S&S, distorted at a MF level. I put a set of Isaac's on and > >the distortion could not be found at any level. So, how much can be > >inferred from the hammer and how much from the board and how can we tell > >the difference. Did I have a truly awful hammer to cause such > >distortion? > > Since it's typically a customer complaint that starts all this, I do the > usual plucking, voicing, and some sample hammer swapping to try and > separate effects. Overly hard hammers can do something very similar, though > I don't know why exactly unless it's high contact time from lack of > resilience. Hard hammers can make front duplexes extra noisy and shorten > sustain too, which is why we try some voicing first. I've always thought > that starting voicing procedures on a new set of hammers by filling them > with lacquer was an odd approach, but what do I know? I service more than a > few pianos in which this distortion increases and decreases with seasonal > humidity swings, so my final voicing test is how it sounds in the driest > part of the winter. When you can't make it go away by doing something to > the hammer, it's the board. > > >I was impressed by the hammers and by the piano all over > >again. Oh, forgot, the piano had been restrung but that should not have > >made that much of a difference. > > > >Thoughts? Cackling? Distortion? > > > > Newton > > Unless it had been restrung after testing the old hammers, and before > installing the new. <G> > > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC