SAT vs Verituner

[Mickey Kessler]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Isaac Oleg,

Thanks so much for the info.  If it's okay with you, I may email you 
privately when I get closer to making a decision.

thanks,
Mickey


At 11:33 PM 1/3/02 +0100, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I did not use very long a SAT II, because I switched to RCT soon, but I am
>actually tuning with a VT 100 since october, and find this tool more
>artistic in essence. It gives very precise and even tunings without much
>tweaking, as it take in account the inharmonicity parameters of any note
>tuned.
>
>There is an adjustable strech fonction that can be used on the fly but the
>result will only apply to the notes you did not tune yet (as the tuning is
>computed at every new note tuned) unless you ask for. That can be similar to
>the stretch function I understand is implemented on the SAT III.
>
>The unit is a little bigger and heavier, because of the LCD display, you may
>have it not too far from your eyes, but it reads good. Upgrades comes by the
>Internet.
>
>I like to tune with this tuner way much than with the others I used, because
>it does not try to force the tuning in a specific one partial curve, that I
>think is audible, anyway for me ( a little like the sound of the "pure
>fifths tunings" which is something a little unnatural that we propose to the
>piano.
>
>Anyway I was not able to use RCT or a SAT to obtain a pure fifths tuning ,
>the software could not compute it.
>The tunings computed by the VT seems to be as a medium stretch very fine
>aural tuning. I did not try to use it with large stretches, as I feel the
>way we tune "in the stretch" is different that what the ETD compute.
>
>But I always can accept the proposal of the VT100 (some rare exceptions of
>course but a very few)and it was not the case with the other units (sometime
>it was a real fight).
>
>Hope that helps , don't hesitate to mail me privately if you wish, I feel
>that the one partial method is very present there and many don't want to see
>the drawbacks of this.
>
>What I was feeling is that the use of the 1 partial EDT's changed the way I
>tuned to the point I was focusing too much on the partial I choose. But of
>course I learned a lot and appreciate a lot to have these tools when I used
>them.
>
>
>Regards

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/91/9c/28/05/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--