I'm no expert, but I certainly do have an opinion. :-) Even me, Mr. "440 or else!" makes exceptions. I too may have not pushed for a pitch raise here. If there was a child taking lessons, I may have recommended 440, but if its just folks banging away now and then, I would agree with your course of action. If they will consider getting a better piano in the future, but money is a big issue, I'll offer to skip the first and last octave for 25% off the tuning fee! :-) (Have you ever been asked that one?) Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "sid blum" <sid@sover.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: Re: Wim/Pitch raise experiment SNIP > Yesterday it was a seventy five year old upright which was more or > less functional except for the bass bridge... Serious crack along the lower > pins, looked like tuning might be stable enough if additional string tension > didn't exacerbate the problem. Still enough side bearing on the upper pins > that it didn't sound horrible. Average pitch around fifty cents flat. > These people can not afford even an epoxy job (of witch I still am not > convinced). > > I have been fearlessly doing 150 cent pitch raises for years, but in this > case advised to leave piano flat and save money towards new piano. Was I > shortchanging my customer? > > > (Oh yes, I charge 150% for pitch raises, the rate goes DOWN for each pass > since it is so fast) >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC