Varnish--Hard finish vs Soft finish

Joseph Garrett joegarrett@earthlink.net
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:19:21 -0800


I ran into a beautiful Bechstein, 7' grand one time many years ago. It had
been "rebuilt" in Europe by a "highly recommended" rebuilder. The finish was
exquisite, the action work was acceptable, the stringing was acceptable, the
tone/sound was lousy! It took me a while to figure it out. While I was
crawling around under the piano, I noticed gobs of "finish" around the nose
bolt holes. Upon careful examination I discovered that the "rebuilder" had
finished the board with a Polyester Finish!!! It looked beautiful, but that
board was as dead as any board I have ever seen, before or since. Another
aspect, that I find in my preferences, is that the sound of pianos with
lacquered boards, really offends my ear; whereas those with a Varnish finish
pleases my ear. Now, having said that, that is my personal preference. The
sound appears "thin" to me, in the lacquered boards. As I am talking about
new as well as rebuilt pianos, I have to attribute all that to the finish
used. There have been many articles written about the "Varnishes" of the
great Violin makers, etc. It is my belief that the varnish does have a great
deal to do with the tone the wood produces. For one thing, varnish soaks
into the wood, (this is the reason I use the very best natural esters type
varnish that I can find. I believe these esters, (or whatever you want to
call them), are natural to wood and I believe that filling the pores with
them, enhances the board's ability to produce a more mellow, (my
preference), tone. For those who like the brittle sound of modern "cookie
cutter" pianos, forget the varnish and use lacquer. Just MHO. I could go on
for several paragraphs about this, but I'm sure there are those who are glad
that I don't. <G>
Regards,
Joe Garrett, RPT, (Oregon)
V



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC