Isn't accuracy and tuning square grands and impossibility?...;-] I agree that a flexing tuning hammer is not the way to go. David I. ----- Original message ----------------------------------------> From: Joseph Garrett <joegarrett@earthlink.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Received: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:23:20 -0700 Subject: Tuning Square Grands/Tuning Hammer >All, >There has been much talk, lately, about the virtues of good tuning hammers. >Also, some about an extra long tuning hammer for tuning Square Grands. If'n >ya think about it, the extra long tuning lever, to be used on Square Grands, >is not the way to go. The longer the lever the greater the mechanical >leverage AND the lesser is the accuracy! >I use a standard tuning lever, (Hale), for tuning Square Grands with the >appropriate tip/head combination. When I tune Square Grands that have the >olde "oval" tuning pins, I use my 1900 Hale hammer with a double head. >As for kneeling or sitting to tune the Square Grand, that's just fine for >those who are NOT "height challenged". <G> As I stated in a previous post, I >have a former student/friend/tuner who definately falls in this category. He >sits to tune full sized uprights! >I think the bottom line is what ever is most comfortable for each individual >is the best technique. The olde technique of having someone sit at the front >and play the keys, while you sit at the rear and tune, doesn't really appeal >to me, but can be done, if you work at it. Seems to me that that technique >is asking a great deal of the client, unless you bring an assistant for that >purpose. >Best Regards, >Joe Garrett, RPT, (Oregon)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC