DC back cover substitute

David M. Porritt dm.porritt@verizon.net
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:53:02 -0500


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Well, our patent system is really in trouble.  Two of the criteria to
obtain a patent are that the idea has to be non-obvious, and not done
before (prior art).  I'm personally not sure a back cover for a
Dampp-Chaser qualifies on either score.

dave
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 7/16/02 at 4:30 PM Clyde Hollinger wrote:
Well, we shouldn't be so flippant about that.  The law is the law.
Getting a patent is expensive, so I'm told, not to mention all the R
& D Dampp-Chaser puts into developing and improving their products. 
Regards, Clyde Hollinger, RPT 
David Ilvedson wrote: 
Yeah, right... >As a gentle reminder, I do need to say that
Dampp-Chaser Corporation has a US patent for vertical backside covers
and grand >undercovers used in conjunction with pianos having climate
control systems.  Thanks. >Roger Wheelock, VP>Dampp-Chaser Corp.
_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/3a/1c/c0/ca/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--




This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC