Joe, The following public access information is available for your reading pleasure. I dont know if this fits your bill, but the page has a couple links with all kinds of wire specifics. Juan Más Cabré wrote an article recently in the Journal that perhaps you have read ? http://www.puresound-wire.com With this information in mind... just what is it that you are concerned about ? I suppose you have something specific that bothers you ? If there is a good reason not to put this on I would of course really like to know before I start the job. Malcom Rose is a competitor, and I am uncertain whether or not this puts him is a less then objective position if you get my meaning. Cheers ! RicB Joseph Garrett wrote: > > Richard, > "...the maker of this stuff recommends it for any instrument older than > 1910 - 1920, saying it has more similaritees to older wire then other modern > wires do." > HMMMMM? > I've been trying to get some REAL specifics from Malcolm Rose, regarding > this wire. So far he's being evasive. When we are able to compare breaking > strengths, cross-sectional mass, etc., then, and only then, will it be > apparent if this wire is "appropriate" for "instrument(s) older then 1910 - > 1920...". > > Joe Garrett, RPT, (Oregon) > > Squares Need Love Too!<G>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC