"PTG Convention is focused on teaching...."

[Erwinspiano@AOL.COM]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 7/18/2002 2:24:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, avery@ev1.net 
writes:


> Subj:RE: "PTG Convention is focused on teaching...." 
> Date:7/18/2002 2:24:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:avery@ev1.net">avery@ev1.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
>   Avery-- just to be clear the words you quote in this post below weren't 
> mine but you point well taken all the same.

             Dale Erwin

> 
> Dale,
> 
> >I would disagree that reimbursing an instructor for a room or even
> >travel is compensation. It is not fiscally possible for PTG to
> >compensate our fine volunteer instructors for the untold hours they put
> >into their presentations.
> 
> I can understand this.
> 
> >At least it is possible to reimburse some of
> >them for some of their expenses though not all.
> 
> But this I can't understand! Why some but not all. Sounds like political
> BS to me! I know someone who taught at an Annual and couldn't even stand
> in the back of the room to watch a class because they hadn't "registered"
> for that class. Actually, two someones! And of course, they hadn't even
> come close to being reimbursed for what it had cost them to prepare for
> the class and even to get there! To me, that's the height of political BS!
> BTW, one of these two is always politically correct; the other one isn't!
> 
> Avery
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c3/25/4b/b3/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--