windows xp

[Greg Newell]

Your just as susceptible with Win98 as you are with XP if you don't use a 
firewall.

Greg Newell


At 09:24 PM 6/22/2002, you wrote:
>I definitely will stay with 98 SE then if all this other "snooper" &
>"spyware" stuff is true...  8 (
>
>Best,
>Greg Torres
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Don" <pianotuna@accesscomm.ca>
>To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
>Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 8:06 PM
>Subject: windows xp
>
>
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > It's a bit worse than Greg suggested. It often goes "awol" and changes
>your
> > settings when yet another patch is *auto installed* while you are online.
> > It also *locks* onto all your components so adding things later may cause
> > it to not run, if you change an item like for example a sound card.
> >
> > At 08:19 PM 6/22/02 EDT, you wrote:
> > >
> > >In a message dated 22/06/02 8:14:34 PM, Tunapiana440@cox.net writes:
> > >
> > ><< WIN 98 is also a lot less intrusive than XP. >>
> > >
> > >Ok Greg... since I am a Macophile and have a new laptop on which XP is
>the
> > >OS...boy talk about a challenge!! :-) Can you tell me what is meant by XP
> > >"being so intrusive"? You are not the only person to make this comment
>and I
> > >have no idea what it means... {:-)
> > >Jim Bryant (FL)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.M.T., R.P.T.
> >
> > mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca
> >
> > http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/
> >
> > 3004 Grant Rd.
> > REGINA, SK
> > S4S 5G7
> > 306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner

Greg Newell
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net