I have 3 PC's networked behind a router with a firewall as well as Norton antivirus on all 3 machines... Greg Torres ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Newell" <gnewell@ameritech.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:02 AM Subject: Re: windows xp > Your just as susceptible with Win98 as you are with XP if you don't use a > firewall. > > Greg Newell > > > At 09:24 PM 6/22/2002, you wrote: > >I definitely will stay with 98 SE then if all this other "snooper" & > >"spyware" stuff is true... 8 ( > > > >Best, > >Greg Torres > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Don" <pianotuna@accesscomm.ca> > >To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > >Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 8:06 PM > >Subject: windows xp > > > > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > > > It's a bit worse than Greg suggested. It often goes "awol" and changes > >your > > > settings when yet another patch is *auto installed* while you are online. > > > It also *locks* onto all your components so adding things later may cause > > > it to not run, if you change an item like for example a sound card. > > > > > > At 08:19 PM 6/22/02 EDT, you wrote: > > > > > > > >In a message dated 22/06/02 8:14:34 PM, Tunapiana440@cox.net writes: > > > > > > > ><< WIN 98 is also a lot less intrusive than XP. >> > > > > > > > >Ok Greg... since I am a Macophile and have a new laptop on which XP is > >the > > > >OS...boy talk about a challenge!! :-) Can you tell me what is meant by XP > > > >"being so intrusive"? You are not the only person to make this comment > >and I > > > >have no idea what it means... {:-) > > > >Jim Bryant (FL) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.M.T., R.P.T. > > > > > > mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca > > > > > > http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/ > > > > > > 3004 Grant Rd. > > > REGINA, SK > > > S4S 5G7 > > > 306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner > > Greg Newell > mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC