----- Original Message ----- From: "Barrie Heaton" <piano@a440.co.uk> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 12:27 AM Subject: Re: Then there were one > In message > <5.2.0.9.0.20030410160828.00aecd18@mailhost.cleveland.oh.ameritech.net>, > Greg Newell <gnewell@ameritech.net> writes > >Barrie, > > This IS sad news..... > >... To what do you attribute this companies demise? > > Cheep overseas pianos, it was OK when the quality was not so good.... > but the quality has improved and the price has come down in real terms > on some of the overseas pianos > > Yet Kemble is doing very well, but they have a very modern conveyor > style production plant which keeps costs down and has increased quality > as well > > Barrie, > It is very difficult for the small piano maker to survive these days. In times past the small maker could rely on its name and its heritage to position itself in the marketplace. Today, with so many wonderful old names (and their accompanying heritage) are available for little or nothing, instant name recognition and heritage is available cheap. In just the time it takes for your lawyer to file the appropriate papers you can become a piano maker with 150 years of quality and heritage behind you even if your ancestors didn't know what pianos were back then. The ethics of this is a whole other issue and is one still not being dealt with in our industry. My point being that it takes more than just heritage and tradition for the small maker to survive these days. More than just a good name. The small maker in Europe or the U.S. will never again be price-competitive with the machine-made pianos of Asia. Not even given a "modern, conveyor-style production plant--just ask Baldwin. And, as the production machines continuously improve, it will also become increasingly difficult for the small maker to compete in production quality and performance. It is going to take more than just good performance or traditional performance--it is going to take state-of-the art performance and ever-improving performance. And that has been and still is too often lacking. The last time I looked at the pianos being offered by The British Piano Manufacturing Company I was relatively unimpressed with the pianos they were building. Which is not to say the pianos were not well-made. In terms of construction quality and appearance they were certainly acceptable. But their performance level was no better than many other similar pianos of equal born-again "heritage" now flooding the market at much lower prices. I didn't spend a lot of time examining any of these instruments--it was clear that the various executives representing the company that they did not want to hear anything I might have had to say about their pianos. Nor were they interested in my visiting their factory (at my own expense in those days) or in discussing anything related to the design of the pianos they were building or any suggestions I might have for improving them. In most cases a few relatively simple and inexpensive design changes would have yielded substantial performance improvements. Enough to keep them at least slightly ahead of their nearest competitors. But such was not to be. Like many other, now defunct, piano makers they were content to press on, cranking out the same old designs year after year, competing only in the areas of price, aesthetics and heritage. And, in a day when price is determined by huge factories cranking out "pianos" by the tens of thousands, aesthetics are cookie-cutter monotonous and instant heritage is available for a few dollars down, that's not enough. Del Delwin D Fandrich Piano Designer & Builder Hoquiam, Washington 98550 USA 360.532-2563 360.532-6688 pianobuilders@olynet.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC