Um, didn't Mason and Hamlin once supply dealers with a little demonstation gadget, in which a "rib" lay on a base between two rigids ends positiouned at exactly the "rib's" length. The insertion of a mere business card between one end and its stop then caused a marked rise in the rib's center. Thump --- A440A@aol.com wrote: > Ron writes: > << Soundboard crown still isn't supported like a > buttressed arch, Ed, and rim > or belly rail spreading the few thousandth's > difference between the length > dimension measured straight from rib end to rib end, > and that measured from > rib end to rib end over the crown won't make the > crown go flat. It just > won't.<< > > I know that someone has done the math on this. > How much "spread" is > required of a rib that is 20 inches long, curved on > a radius of say 40' to > allow the center to drop .020"??? It has been too > long since I dragged my > kids through high school geometry to remember arc > and such, but I know > somebody out there has the answer at hand. > > >>Flexibility in the belly rail and rim will > certainly damp the > soundboard and affect tone production adversely, but > the crown is formed > and supported by rib and panel, independent of the > rim. >> > > There is evidence for debate on the arch theory. > The observed change in > the Mason & Hamilin centripedal resonator when the > strings are removed. In > every case I have seen, (more than several), > destringing a Mason changes the > tension on the bars, ( judged by rattles that appear > when destrung). > Perhaps the strongest indication I know of that > the arched board attempts > to spread the case is the Chickering grands with the > inner rim. All of these > pianos,(I have had 4 of them), when destrung, show > the inner rim to come > inwards. A wedge that is very lightly placed > between the inner and outer rim > before stringing will be extremely tight when the > strings are pulled up to > pitch and the screws that pass from inner to outer > around the perimeter will > also be looser. There is definitely outward > movement of the relatively > flexible inner rim under downbearing pressure. If > the board simply presses > downward on the shelf, this particular construction, > with its cantilevered > support, would bend inwards, no? These Chickerings > also have really nice > sound with virtually no bearing, even though without > any strings on them, > there is a boatload of bearing They simply flatten > out and I have, in the > past, attempted to add bearing by lowering > nosebolts,but the board just keeps > on flattening out as I do. > The unsupported span of the belly rail on grands > often has a slight curve > outwards between the horn and their attachment to > the treble case side. I > don't think this was built into the pianos > originally, so what other force > but soundboard spread would do this? > Ed Foote RPT > www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/ > www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC