Dear Richard, If for no other reason, using a spring that works 12 grams or so means the absence of two large key leads in the middle of the key. When combined with a proper match of hammer weight and ratio this means that only a small amount of key lead is needed... I like that... The absence of lead that comes with using wippen support springs has consistently shown to improve repetition by lowering key mass. The adjustability feature is not used that often but when it is it's very easy with the adjustable spring and if the need arises one doesn't shy away from the task. Without the screw adjustable feature one will find excuses to put off the task of fine tuning the touchweight. David Stanwood PS - Strike Weight Ratio is SWR for short... At 12:17 AM 6/8/03 +0200, you wrote: > > >"David C. Stanwood" wrote: > >> I have never considered it to be a problem because the motion of the hammer >> when measuring up and down weight without springs is not significantly >> different with them. > >This is actually a very good point in favour of whippen assist springs. Tho I >still dont really see the added range of configurations possible with them to be >all that usefull, nor do I see the advantage of being able to adjust BW quickly >to be that overwhelming. > >How often are you actually going to be changing BW in this matter ? I mean really >how often ?? And in the vast majority of situations we dont need more SW then a >SWR 5.5 ratio can handle. > >btw David... as long as you are "here" for the moment :).... what do you prefer >as a short for the Stanwood Ratio... SWR or SBR.... just sost we are all using >the same thing. > >Cheers > >RicB >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC