assist springs

David C. Stanwood stanwood@tiac.net
Sun, 08 Jun 2003 08:18:37 -0400


Dear Richard,

If for no other reason, using a spring that works 12 grams or so means the
absence of two large key leads in the middle of the key.  When combined
with a proper match of hammer weight and ratio this means that only a small
amount of key lead is needed... I like that...  The absence of lead that
comes with using wippen support springs has consistently shown to improve
repetition by lowering key mass.  The adjustability feature is not used
that often but when it is it's very easy with the adjustable spring and if
the need arises one doesn't shy away from the task.  Without the screw
adjustable feature one will find excuses to put off the task of fine tuning
the touchweight.  

David Stanwood

PS - Strike Weight Ratio is SWR for short... 
 
At 12:17 AM 6/8/03 +0200, you wrote:
>
>
>"David C. Stanwood" wrote:
>
>> I have never considered it to be a problem because the motion of the hammer
>> when measuring up and down weight without springs is not significantly
>> different with them.
>
>This is actually a very good point in favour of whippen assist springs. Tho I
>still dont really see the added range of configurations possible with them
to be
>all that usefull, nor do I see the advantage of being able to adjust BW
quickly
>to be that overwhelming.
>
>How often are you actually going to be changing BW in this matter ? I mean
really
>how often ??  And in the vast majority of situations we dont need more SW
then a
>SWR 5.5 ratio can handle.
>
>btw David... as long as you are "here" for the moment :).... what do you
prefer
>as a short for the Stanwood Ratio... SWR or SBR.... just sost we are all
using
>the same thing.
>
>Cheers
>
>RicB
>


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC