Mark Davidson wrote: > I think perhaps I shouldn't have used the work "geometry" as I > did not mean to suggest "action geometry" in the usual sense. > I was referring to the note to note evenness of dimensions > of all the parts in the action. Since inertia is a function of > mass and position, smooth inertia is implied by smooth mass and > smooth position. > > -Mark Ah... well... thats a horse of a different oder. But I am glad I misunderstood... gave me a chance to soap it a bit :) Course this is the real sticker.... keys sticks are going to be different dimensions no matter how you look at it.. which means either they are made of a material which mass is not significant enough in these conexions... or we redesign how they are made dimensionally so that they conform well enough to a standard key. I kind of think that at the outset that we are looking at the first option to begin with. The variance in key stick mass perhaps can be << overlooked >>... at least in an attempt to arrive at a next step in all this dynamic balancing stuphfe. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC