At 2:40 PM -0700 6/19/03, Phillip Ford wrote: > >The virtual capstan is comprised of two adjustable opposing magnets, one >>on the underside of the whippen forward of the whippen cushion (heel), >>the other just forward of the capstan on the key and directly under the >>whippen magnet. >> >>The effect and purpose.... >> >>Richard Brekne > >19 June 2003 > >An interesting idea. I'm not sure that I see how the effects of >this device differ from those of a whippen assist spring. The big issue here is coupling between the key and the weight on the capstan. I imagine it would be pretty good as long as the return stroke is faster than that which would occur by gravity alone. That way, the key having one reason greater than gravity for which to do the return stroke, magnetic repulsion of what is the driving lever(s) in this situation, the wippen, carrying a hammer and shank. If you're looking for a force to make the key return faster than gravity, this magnetic repulsion is it. The two magnets are coupled together in that, should the key move too fast in relation to the wippen, it will move out of the wippen magnet's influence, and lose speed (until the wippen catches up again). When magnets are the dominant forces in the return stroke of the parts, there is no reason for the key (the driven lever) to go any faster than the wippen/shank (driving levers). That is, unless of course somebody then lowered the FWs, so that the key's now-lower moment of inertia would cause it to accelerate faster under the wippen/shank's first kick back into the return stroke. How this coupling would be different with springs is not clear. At anyrate, have at it, Ric! This might just be the way to get an action optimized for both soft and hard play. >I agree with your point about the friction at the knuckle. Its a >good thing... in reasonable amounts. In slow playing, it's the pianist's final guage as to their speed. As their fngers push ther way through ts suddenly elevated friction, they can tell by how quickly they slow down whether their actual speed is what they were calculating it to be. >I've been playing with the basic concept of spliting the weight and >distance components of the action ratio into two seperatly >adjustable quantities for about 8 months now. Tried some pretty >weird things. Care to confess? >But the main problem has always been finding something >that didnt get in the way of regulating the standard capstan. This >solves that problem. Again, congratulations. Bill Ballard RPT NH Chapter, P.T.G. Visit Bhod Ankur, the underwater monument to yesterday's civilisation. +++++++++++++++++++++
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC