I see that my comments about "rake angle" have stirred up other comments and arguments. All I was trying to do was to show you fellows that just because the hammer is pointed straight toward the string, it does not mean that it is moving in that direction. Someone sent a jpeg image to illustrate a point. My computer has jpeg as well as psp, but that illustration came through as two pages of jibberish. The system either can't handle it, or else I don't have the right version of jpeg to read it. It doesn't matter. I understood what he was talking about. I was trying to expose a fallacy, and I think it worked. I was not advocating some crazy impractical design. Theory and practicality often don't go hand in hand. A few years ago, many piano technicians believed that a tuning hammer with a very short head would reduce the bending force on the tuning pin despite the fact that the head was bored at a very high angle, which elevated the handle and put the tuner's hand high up in the air. (I'm using a grand piano for illustration.) I saw that I was getting nowhere when I told them that the very high angle of the handle defeated the effect of the very short head, because it put the application of force high up above the tuning pin. So finally I said, "OK, keep raising the angle of the handle until you have it pointing straight up. Now, what will that do"? PAUSE - PAUSE. "OH, yeah, now I see it"! Well, I was not advocating a tuning hammer with the handle pointing straight up. I was using an absurd illustration to make a point, and it worked. As long as we have actions where hammers are attached to shanks that swing in arcs, we will have hammers that do not move straight toward the strings. No matter what we do, that hammer is going to be rotating about an axis as it moves toward the string, and the crown will hit the string a somewhat glancing blow. All we are trying to do is to minimize that glancing blow. Actions have been visualized in people's minds that enable the hammers to hit the strings straight on, but they are very impractical, so we don't go there. We just stay with what is practical, and try to minimize the shortcomings. Sincerely, Jim Ellis, RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC