Samick grand backcheck wear

Greg Newell gnewell@ameritech.net
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:02:13 -0500


---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment
Quite right Roger. I just didn't know what the customers monetary tolerance 
threshold was and thus offered a way out while still getting the job done.

Greg


At 09:56 PM 3/28/2003, you wrote:


>Hi Greg.
>               May as well change that 'leather' it is some form of 
> synthetic, and it is not that durable.
>Another change in production that's been corrected.
>Regards Roger
>
>At 05:33 PM 3/28/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>Clyde,
>>         As is often the case, someone beat me to it. I definitely second 
>> Roger's entire post. Most all of the Samick products I've seen exhibit 
>> the same excessive checkering of the tails. Thankfully they've left 
>> enough meat on the hammer tail to correct the problem without replacing 
>> the hammers. The Spurlock jig is excellent and easy to use. I use the 
>> jig in conjunction with a 1" belt sander      but you could use it with 
>> a disc sander as well. Simple and fast and it makes a huge difference in 
>> how effectively the hammer checks. Look for much faster repetition as a 
>> result of your work.
>>
>>Greg Newell
>>
>>P.S. If you haven't lost too much meat from the backcheck leather you 
>>might not have to replace that. I've done it without with good success 
>>but the backcheck leather has to have a smooth surface to it. No gouges 
>>or little flaps of leather hanging there.
>>
>>
>>
>>At 11:39 AM 3/28/2003, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> > But in the process I noticed something else that surprised me,
>>>> > especially in a 7-year-old piano that probably doesn't get played more
>>>> > than an hour a week.  In the center of the piano where the use is
>>>> > heaviest, the backcheck buckskin is worn almost through to the felt.
>>>> > The hammer tails have like little micro-mini steps cut into them with
>>>> > very pronounced edges.  Now grand actions are not my forte, but I never
>>>> > saw anything quite this severe before.  I fully expect in another year
>>>> > or two the felt will be cut through.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Clyde,
>>>                  You need to re leather the back checks, with a quality 
>>> back check leather, and arc the hammer tails. I suggest using the Spurlock jig.
>>>The tails must be square with the hammer rail, the jig will look after 
>>>this.  You will then have to Realign the back checks, and adjust the 
>>>rake of the checks.
>>>The leather part of the job will be covered by warranty.  The tailing is 
>>>considered a design change,
>>>Current production has this change.
>>>Call Robert at 1-800-592-9393 for Authorization.
>>>Regards Roger
>>>Tech Consultant.
>>>Samickmusic USA
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>>
>>Greg Newell
>>mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>

Greg Newell
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net 

---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment--


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC