Rear Duplex Bars on Steinways: was Baldwin Accujust...

Richard Brekne Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
Sat, 10 May 2003 23:45:44 +0200



Farrell wrote:

> What should Steinway call a piano they make much of, but put a 400 lb. chunk of cast iron in that they buy from Kelly Plate in Springfield, Ohio?
>
>

Its their design. Kelly makes the plates to Steinways specification. And one thing that Ron mentioned I'll agree with.... namely that this issue isnt
about this piano or the other.

IMV its about when exactly do  design changes as part of a  rebuild so significantly alter the origional intent and purpose of the manufacturer that
it should no longer bear only that manufacturers name. And if and when that border is crossed, why then should not the rebuilder be most interested
indeed in profiling saids own good name in some appropriate manner on the fallboard, or in some other discrete yet very visable position ?

As said, I am rather conservative in my view here. I dont think much of any design issue should be changed unless one is both willing and wanting to
mark the instrument accordingly. Others will no doubt have another view.


--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
UiB, Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC