At 9:20 AM +0200 5/12/03, Richard Brekne wrote: >An important distinction to be sure. And... as long as you mentioned >it... we could >really get into just how the mass of the "bone" as it were... or the >shank itself >contributes to the whole thing. It has a resonance of its own, and how much it >flex's is a determinant in how other factors contribute. We talked about the flexing of the shank, but nobody had a clear idea of how much of that was still present when the hammer hits the string. You're right, higher SWs mean more shank flex. >Do I understand you here to also be drawing up a distinction between >adding leads to the core of the hammer vs just plain more hammer felt ? Yes, the distinction becomes clearer when considering just the hammer head itself. Felt = muscle, molding (with or w/out leads) = bone. (At the risk of oversimplification......) Cheers, Bill Ballard RPT NH Chapter, P.T.G. "You'll make more money selling my advice than following it" ...........Steve Forbes, quoting his father, Malcom +++++++++++++++++++++
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC