hammer mass (was Wurzen felt)

[Greg Newell]

---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment

David,
         You did send a correction. Unfortunately I responded to the first=
=20
e-mail before reading the second.

Best,
Greg


At 04:48 PM 5/12/2003, you wrote:

>I thought I sent a correction on that, maybe I sent it to myself by
>mistake.  Of course, you are right.  I meant 7/32".
>
>David Love
>davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Greg Newell <gnewell@ameritech.net>
> > To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org>; <davidlovepianos@earthlink.net>
> > Date: 5/12/2003 10:49:13 AM
> > Subject: RE: hammer mass (was Wurzen felt)
> >
> > David,
> >          Not to be too pickyune but I do hope you meant a 7/32" shank
>and=3D20
> > not 7/16".
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> >
> > At 01:32 PM 5/12/2003, you wrote:
> >
> > >Yes, it seems that it is not a pure test.  It was interesting, however,
>to
> > >observe the difference.   It brings something else to mind, which is=
 what
> > >happens when, say, a new action with 7/16" shanks is combined with a
>hammer
> > >weight from the original design which utilized 3/16" shanks and of a
> > >different species of wood.  My own experience does suggest that a light
> > >hammer on a 3/16" maple shank does not sound the same as that same=
 hammer
> > >on a hex 7/16" shank made of hornbeam.
> > >
> > >David Love
> > >davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
> >
> > Greg Newell
> > Greg's piano Fort=3DE9
> > mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net=3D20
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives

Greg Newell
Greg's piano Fort=E9
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net=20

---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment--