---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment On vrijdag, mei 30, 2003, at 16:24 Europe/Amsterdam, Keith Roberts=20 wrote: > I think this is right. =46rom the recent discussion on how much the=20 > action=A0parts flex, especially on a concert grand because of the=20 > heavier hammers, the backcheck could brush the hammer tail on a FFF=20 > blow but not be detected by using your hand to pressure the hammer and=20= > won't happen unless you try to hit a very hard blow. That would=20 > decrease the volume only on the hardest blows but not have an effect=20= > on soft or medium blows. Lowering the backcheck (we are not talking=20 > about checking height here we are talking about the height of the=20 > backcheck) would give the hammer a fraction of a second longer to get=20= > out of the way. > Keith Roberts And yet, even if you don't bang on a piano, you will notice a tonal=20 improvement when you adjust the back check height with the 2mm result. Try it out and tell me what you think? Antares, The Netherlands see my website at : www.concertpianoservice.nl ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1130 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/5a/ae/21/63/attachment.bin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC