OT:Re: Thanks to all-Now VERY OT-Baseball-delete and keep yourshorts on if not interested

[Greg Newell]

---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment
Richard and list,
         I'll once more bring up the idea that was presented by someone=20
else a short while ago. If posts are clearly marked OT why not just set=20
your filter to auto delete them? Or in the case of Duane and now perhaps=20
myself why don't you just filter anything that comes from either of us?=20
Seems rather simple enough. I do not have any agenda for any particular=20
topic. The item that I shared was a seemingly huge breakthrough in the=20
computer industry that will one day soon affect us all! Imagine the=20
computing power we now enjoy in our desktops or laptops available in a PDA.=
=20
Surely that would interest almost everyone, no? If not .... delete.

my 2 cents,

Greg




At 05:33 PM 10/8/2003, you wrote:

>The hang up is that some of us do not have time to wade through 60 to
>70+++ messages to find technical items. How many in your chapter are
>read this list? Not many in mine! A lot of folks that could offer insite
>are not here because of the huge bulk of messages. Additionally one
>person in particular has an agenda against MS that he insists on
>displaying here. Even though he has stated he would take it off our
>list. He hasn't. Back again to day. I don't mind the OT that do not
>reflect an agenda. Darn guy must drive a van with I hate MS on the
>sides. Rich
>
>Greg Newell wrote:
> >
> > In a, perhaps, vain attempt at nipping this in the bud before it gets=
 out
> > of hand again .... could we simply agree to put OT in the header for
> > anyones off topic post? It sure seems like this would be a great deal
> > easier. The party or parties who do not wish to receive them could=
 simply
> > use their filters to filter out OT in any header and they would never=
 have
> > to see them at all!  Personally I can't understand what the hang up is
> > about sharing items of interest with people you care about. Certainly it
> > can't be about bandwidth anymore, can it?
> >
> > Greg Newell
> >
> > At 11:11 AM 10/8/2003, you wrote:
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On
> > >Behalf Of Hechler Family
> > >Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:42 AM
> > >To: Pianotech
> > >Subject: Re: Thanks to all-Now VERY OT-Baseball-delete and keep your
> > >shorts on if not interested
> > >
> > >SO..... Baseball is a better subject, meaning that it affects everyone,
> > >than MS and Linux news.
> > >
> > >Like the latest in MS forcing things to happen - they want more of
> > >Windows code in the BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) Chip (meaning more
> > >of taking control over your PC, whether you like it or not) !
> > >
> > >Mr. Hechler,
> > >         Are you always this jolly?
> > >         Tom Driscoll
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> >
> > Greg Newell
> > Greg's piano Fort=E9
> > mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net
> >
> >  =
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives

Greg Newell
Greg's piano Fort=E9
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net=20

---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment--