soundboard stresses

[Erwinspiano@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
   Thanks Ric It clears it up!.
  Dale

Hi Dale, 
Nope.. you got it right. I got so many things going on right now I just wrote 
5 % without double checking. Sorry bout that :)  He didnt say how long 
they've been doing things this way. In anycase.. this should be as straight a skinny 
as we can expect to get. So ... in the interests of providing a common basis 
for the whole subject matter...why dont we use this figure in our 
calculations. 
Would be interesting in light of David Porritts posting to find out if there 
was a change from 4.5 % to 5.5 % right after that episode. 
----------- 
Erwinspiano@aol.com wrote: 
 In a message dated 10/13/2003 11:57:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no writes: 
John Patton writes 5 % for Steinway panels. I can copy to the list  his reply 
to me if you wish.
  
OK 
I got it wrong. It was you who posted recently & I thought you said 5.5%EMC. 
Yes Please do forward the response> 
Dale 
  
   RE: Steinway Ribs 
   Date:  Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:42:59 -0400 
   From: "Patton, John" <JPatton@steinway.com> 
   To:"Richard Brekne" <rbrekne@broadpark.no> 
  
Hi Richard.  Sorry about the difficulty you are having there, but I do 
appreciate your support of Steinway.  The 
ribs are flat  and pressed into a curved caul.  However, the panel is dried 
to 5.5%.  Hope that clears it up. 
Best regards, John 
  
Cheers 
RicB 
-- 

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c8/53/4f/64/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--