It seems to me that bedding problems/differences with bench etc, at the extremes of the piano would be nil or close enough for piano work. David I. ----- Original message ----------------------------------------> From: Richard Brekne <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: Newtonburg <pianotech@ptg.org> Received: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:36:25 +0100 Subject: Bore lengths >Hi folks.. >just got through double checking a measurement for borelengths on a >Petrof grand and noticed a rather large discrepancy between on bench >measurements and in piano measurements... and ended up with the >following observation resulting in the accompanying question. >Measuring the distance between strings and keybed, then hammer centers >and keybed yeilded a near 2 mm difference when done on the bench visa vi >done in the piano. At first I thought that well..... its a bit clumsy to >measure in the piano.... so.... But then I got to thinking about >bedding issues and decided to double check very closely in the piano and >came up with very close to the same results. Obviously in this >particular example, the bedding screws accounted for a quite significant >difference in the height of hammer centers. This of course is directly >reflected in the bore length one decides on, so its kind of important to >get the darned thing right. >I ususally go about deciding bore length in a different fashion, but >have lately wanted to try out this <<formula based>> method and stumped >on this right off. >So what do you folks do here ? Go with a bench figure, compensate for >the bedding on the bench, or simply measure in the piano ? If the >bedding screws are taken into account... do you always make sure of >optimal bedding first ?.. >I'd like a bit more detailed description of what you all do in >conjunction with this on the surface simple measurement. >Cheers >RicB >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC