SawStop safety table saw

Greg Newell gnewell@ameritech.net
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:04:51 -0500


Sarah,
         I completely understand your point but what you might be missing 
is that it should not be crammed down other peoples throats just because 
someone seems to have found what THEY consider to be a better way. In fact 
I think that any of the safety equipment that you've mentioned should be 
OPTIONAL not mandatory. This is just one more example of someone assuming 
they know what's best for everyone else and working to pass laws to MAKE 
you conform to their views. I call that meddling in other peoples business. 
There are many things in life that are considered acceptable risk. If I 
walk in my suburb and cross the street I might get hit by a bus. I still 
choose to cross as I deem it an acceptable risk. We drive on wet or snowy 
roads when the danger of fender benders or a serious accident is a very 
real risk and yet we drive. Life is full of inherent dangers. It always 
will be. Not every better way should be legislated and mandatory is my 
point. If I pose no danger to you why should you tell me what I HAVE to do? 
You can preach all day why I should but you should never tell me I MUST.



At 10:33 PM 12/22/2004, you wrote:
>Hi Greg,
>
>My dad was an architect, so I've been around the construction for a huge 
>chunk of my life.  I've known a few VERY careful professionals who have 
>removed parts of their bodies, including a very good friend, who chopped 
>her left index finger off with a miter saw.  All it takes is a bit of 
>fatigue and a fleeting moment of inattention.  While I, too, squirm at the 
>thought of more government regulations, I'm also baffled at why people 
>don't WANT or even DEMAND these sorts of safety features on their 
>equipment!  They're similar to the folks who drive without seat belts and 
>leave loaded, unlocked guns around for their kids to play with.  They 
>think that accidents always happen to OTHER people.
>
>When groaning about the added cost of safety equipment, don't forget to 
>weigh that cost against the cost of reattachment surgery, down-time, and 
>impaired functionality.  What's the real cost?  What is the fraction of 
>people you know, of your skill level and attention to safety, who have 
>de-fingered themselves?  Multiply that fraction by ten or twenty thousand 
>(or much more) dollars.  That's your estimated lifetime cost of finger 
>loss, on average, thinking like a gambler.  Now compare that cost against 
>the cost of the equipment.
>
>And that's just dollars and cents.  How much are your fingers really worth 
>to you?  Much more than the cost of reattachment surgery?  (Mine are.)
>
>I applaud the technology -- "air bags" for power tools.  You can bet that 
>my next table saw will have one, provided it's available.
>
>Peace,
>Sarah
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Newell" <gnewell@ameritech.net>
>To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 3:51 PM
>Subject: Re: SawStop safety table saw
>
>
>>Not only that Cy and Ron but the first I heard of this unit, the inventor 
>>was pushing to get this as a mandatory thing for all saws sold. Trying to 
>>work himself into guaranteed profits it sounds like. Besides even the 
>>unseemliness of that do we really need one more level of government 
>>involved demanding that we have safeguards on our equipment? When will we 
>>learn? Some things are just inherently dangerous. Can't we just 
>>understand that and exercise caution without something more being 
>>demanded of us? This item would certainly cost more and break down on 
>>occasion. I, for one, am not willing to undergo more expense for 
>>someone's careless behavior that cost them a finger. Why punish everyone 
>>for something like that? As an add on? Fine! As mandatory? I'm against it 
>>%1000.
>>
>>my 2 cents
>>
>>Greg Newell
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 03:27 PM 12/22/2004, you wrote:
>>
>>>>Ron, why wouldn't professional woodworkers like it?  What are the 
>>>>downsides, besides the initial expense?  (Assuming you don't trigger 
>>>>the safety device a few times a day...)
>>>>
>>>>--Cy Shuster--
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Cy,
>>>Typically, the first thing the professional does is take off all the 
>>>OSHA approved guards and toss them in the shed. They tend to want to be 
>>>able to see the blade so they know where their hands are in relation to 
>>>it. In this case, the brake doesn't create a hazard by hiding the blade, 
>>>but it adds extra cost for magic that looks altogether too good to be 
>>>believable. Professionals tend to get hurt on table saws by kick-backs 
>>>while sawing something. Can this braking system tell the difference 
>>>between cutting a piece of maple and cutting a piece of maple AND a 
>>>couple of fingers? Seems like that's asking a lot, especially to a 
>>>professional who has spent a lot of years experiencing the limitations 
>>>as well as the capabilities of machinery. It supposedly can, but how far 
>>>can it be trusted, what kind of maintenance is required, does it reset 
>>>automatically, and do you have to risk an occasional hot dog to verify 
>>>that it is still working? Electronic ignitions come to mind. I've spent 
>>>thousands of dollars through the years having electronic ignition 
>>>systems on furnaces and cars repaired (replaced, actually), when I could 
>>>have fixed something with a standing pilot or gapped points easily, 
>>>cheaply, and quickly myself. Does it affect changing blades quickly and 
>>>easily? Maybe I'm wrong, but professionals I've known want simple sturdy 
>>>precise indestructible machinery that doesn't get in their way, or 
>>>depend on something they can't see to work. Ah, that's another thing I 
>>>didn't read. Will a saw thus equipped still work if the sensor dies, or 
>>>is there a "dead man" switch that shuts down the power? Is it 
>>>self-diagnostic? Can replacement parts be gotten for self-maintenance, 
>>>or is the saw down until it can go in to the service center for 
>>>authorized, and presumably expensive, repair? None of this would look 
>>>awfully good to the professional. Is there a site that has some detailed 
>>>practical information?
>>>
>>>Ron N
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>>
>>Greg Newell
>>Greg's piano Forté
>>mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives

Greg Newell
Greg's piano Forté
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net 



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC