replacing a Bluthner action

[Avery Todd]

I thought Richard did "something" along the lines of a magnetic action.
Am I wrong?

Avery

At 08:43 AM 12/29/04, you wrote:
>Hi Richard,
>
>My understanding was that the magnetic action was one step further than
>Stanwoodization. I.e. Stanwood *plus* more.
>
>At 07:18 PM 29/12/2004 +0100, you wrote:
> >Don wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Why not retro fit it with the magnetic type action--that way you will be
> >>able to "dial up" what the player wants.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I would not advise this at all.  I'm really opposed to the whole idea of
> >so called adjustable touchweight systems. These typically do not really
> >adjust anything but static touchweight, and the resulting touch
> >characteristics are really unknown quantities that havent been all that
> >closely looked at yet.
> >
> >Find a  BW and ratio that provide the basic touch characteristics you
> >feel with best provide pianists what they are after, and execute that in
> >an action rebuild, remembering that physical touchweight is inextricably
> >tied to voicing concerns.
> >
> >Cheers
> >RicB
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
> >>Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat
> >>
> >>mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca 
> http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/
> >>
> >>3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
> >>306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> >
> >
>
>Regards,
>Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
>Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat
>
>mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca          http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/
>
>3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
>306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives