This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Barry: As someone said, if you look in the archives you will find a range of = opinions on correspondence courses and in particular about Randy = Potter's course.=20 I started Randy's course about 1 year ago (you can get an extension = which gives you 2 full years to complete it) after being laid off as an = Electrical Engineer after 20 1/2 years. Initially I received pretty good = feedback from Randy, and when I'd call Randy on the phone, he spend a = bunch of time with me and patiently answer my questions (that aspect = never changed). However, in my view, one of the key parts of the course are his = evaluations of your tuning tapes. This just did not take place in a = timely manner! I believe my first tape took about 2 months to be = returned, and I am still waiting for my 2nd tuning tape from last JULY = (2003). I've sent multiple messages asking about it, and placed a note = in my exams, which I've sent to him since then, and haven't heard a = thing. I know he has a strict e-mail format and I've goof that up a few = times, but not enough times to not hear back on this issue and a few = other e-mail questions. My last correspondence with him was that getting = him in the phone is a better method for communication. Well without a = job I really couldn't afford to do that and being the stubborn Dutchman, = just sort decided that if e-mail isn't working then forget it. (e-mail = is mentioned in the course and on his web site as the preferred method = of communication) I've also gotten pretty busy with a new job recently, and I have let my = studies slip so I do not blame Randy totally for this, but to be quite = frank, money was very very tight last year without a job for 15 months. = It was a stretch to come up with the first $900.00 (3 payments of = $300.00) and I was very discouraged that his evaluation of my 2nd tape = just never got back to me. That part of the course is so critical for = those of us without a tuner/technician to work with and provide the = needed feedback. One other comment is that the video tape quality is very poor. I = borrowed some of his course videos from a fellow technician that were = made in the 80's (less material then the newer ones) and the quality of = the video and sound was much much better. As an example, when Jim = Coleman is trying teach how to listen for beats, the audio quality was = so poor that it was hard to know what was sound track tape variations = and what was the actual beating you were suppose to hear. The older tape = did not have this problem - I thought it was me until I listen to them! Finally, because money was so tight, I decided to purchase the course in = shipments. The problem with this is that the video material is spread = out and critical information is not given to you to go with the written = material until shipments 4 & 5. So you end up having to skip or do = certain exams with just the written material. I would not recommend = buying it in shipments if you decide to take this course - get it all at = once so you can have everything you need right up front. Now I've said much in the way of negative comments - there are certainly = many many positive things about the course and it is worth considering. = I believe I've learn much from it and hope to continue this year. Time = is making that tough right now. I hope I haven't dampened your interest in learning to tune and repair = pianos. I've found it to be a real sense of pride and joy taking an = instrument that sounds very poor, and when I'm done in 2-3 hours (I'm = slow), it sounds like a piano again (in my humble opinion). I'm glad I = started down this path and hope to continue. Joe - I live near Dave and Willis Snyder and have been a guest at the = local PTG meetings which they attend and can imagine the face-to-face = classes you took with Dave and others were very rewarding! They are = great guys! (See I can say something positive. : ) Jeff Schlaybach - Robesonia, PA ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joe And Penny Goss=20 To: Pianotech ; Randy Potter ; Randy Potter=20 Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Correspondence tuning courses Hi Barry, I have not taken the course but did attend this years seminar at = Minnisota. 10 days of top of the line class and hands on work. There = were 4 teachers for 26 students, and two groups. Advanced ( 8 working on = passing the tuning test for PTG ) and the 18 working on basic tuning and = repair skills. Randy took the 8 of us while Tom Cobble, Ward Guthrey and = David Snyder worked the 18. Classes went from 8 AM to 10 PM at night with about 45 minutes for = lunch and dinner If you have the TIME and FUNDS a school would be my choice. But Randy = offers another way to gather the knowledge and skills needed to become = proficent in piano work at your pace of learning. Attending the workshop allowed me to get a very good view of the = overall scope of the course. And as a teacher of 39 years can = confidently say that this is a top of the line correspondence course. One insight, due to all the spam out there in the email world, one = must folow Randy's instructions for communication very closely. Any = deviation from the rules will result in your messages not getting = through to him. . Joe Goss imatunr@srvinet.com www.mothergoosetools.com ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Barry=20 To: Piano List=20 Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:43 PM Subject: Correspondence tuning courses Hi everyone.. I would like to get some reaction from you regarding the = correspondence courses available.. eg: Randy Potter and the American = School of Tuning etc. There are no "hands on" courses available in Australia anymore = except occasional apprenticeships. Has anyone successfully passed one of these correspondence courses = and would you recommend them? Thanks Barry ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ae/c2/45/e8/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC