This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Delwin D Fandrich wrote: >>>Please go back and read what I wrote about Baldwin's crowning technique. And then put what I wrote above in its proper context. >>> >>>Del >>> >>> >>> >>> >>I think I understood well enough both what you said and the context. >> >> > >Apparently you did not. I originally said that Baldwin used a combination of >light rib crown and light compression-crowning to achieve their final crown. >It exhibits some of the characteristics of each. > > Well obviously I did then...since thats exactly what I understood you to say. Personally I see nothing in what little I wrote that could be construed otherwise... but just so. >>It would seems to me that if ribs >>did nothing to support crown until they were flat.... indeed aid in the >>effort to flatten the panel... then incremental increase in panel >>stiffness for increase in downbearing would not be possible.. or what ? >> >> > >Or what, indeed -- why must the world be either/or, neither/nor? > > Consistancy... for example ? >I don't know how gradual or abrupt the transition was. I wasn't testing for >that. These were just observations made along the way. Personally, I have no >trouble at all understanding why the transition region was incremental. > >Del > > Great !.. then it should be no problem explaining this to the rest of us. Cheers RicB ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/f4/a6/53/cf/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC