... but isn't it so that action with too low key inertia causes for the pianist problems to control his playing ? Isn't some inertia desirable, as it integers smoothly all the unequalities of the pianist's fingers ? As long as apparent weight at fast playing is reasonable, and repetition good enough, I would think that the more inertia, the better control (kind of : "you want that effect, so you have to move your fingers accordingly" rather than "hey, I didnt want that effect" occuring with too low key inertia actions). Or do I miss something again ? Stéphane Collin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: "Phillip Ford" <fordpiano@earthlink.net>; "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 12:42 PM Subject: Re: Hamburg B Key Inertia > Doesnt sound like factory work to me. Could be just someone who found a > DW problem and solved it that way. Not exactly uncommon. > > Cheers > RicB > > Phillip Ford wrote: > > >Recently I saw a Hamburg B (1970s) on which the keys had been front weighted and back weighted on the last few notes before the bass/tenor break. Say notes 16 or 17-20. It looks as if they were trying to increase the inertia on the last few keys before the break. Any ideas about why they would do this? > > > >Phil Ford > > > > > > > >Phillip Ford > >Piano Service and Restoration > >San Francisco, CA > >_______________________________________________ > >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC