I am flabbergasted Ric, what the heck do you mean? EAR On 9-feb-04, at 16:33, Richard Brekne wrote: > Depends on what you mean by the word "judge". For example, once a > decision is made as to the frequencies a given note SHOULD exhibit > when tuned, the tuning device can judge whether or not the note > conforms to whit therein.. On the other hand, the tuning device is not > able do make the origional judgement as to the desired frequencies in > the first place. > Its like the old idea in the NFL about using cameras to make certain > calls. The camera is more capable to make the call in some instances > then the referee ever could be... but it is totally incapable of > deciding what the rules of the game should be. > > Its all very philological you see :) > > Cheers > RicB > > Farrell wrote: > >> "The ear is by far the better judge of tuning IMHO than any >> electronic tuning device..." >> I thought the only way to /judge/ a tuning was by ear. >> My Verituner calculates a very nice tuning. I was not aware of a >> "judging" function. Can the Verituner or any other ETD "judge" a >> tuning? >> Terry Farrell >> > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > friendly greetings from André Oorebeek Amsterdam - The Netherlands 0031-20-6237357 0645-492389 0031-75-6226878 www.concertpianoservice.nl www.grandpiano.nl
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC