This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A watt is a power unit, like horsepower. A BTU is a heat or energy unit. = Power is energy sustained over time, as in so many btu=92s per hour. So = if we are starting with a power unit, watts in this case, we multiply by = a time unit to get how much total energy is produced. 1 btu/min =3D = 17.57 watts or 1 btu =3D 17.57watt-minutes. So to convert 25 watts = burned over one hour to btus: =20 25 watts X 60 minutes / 17.57 watt-minutes/BTU =3D 85 BTU =20 So a 25 watt D-chaser bar burning for one hour produces 85 BTU=92s of = heat. Notice the length of the bar does not enter the equation. Since = the shorter bar has to dissipate the same amount of heat in a shorter = length, it stabilizes at a higher temperature. But the total heat = produced is the same.=20 =20 Dean =20 Dean May cell 812.239.3359 PianoRebuilders.com 812.235.5272 Terre Haute IN 47802 =20 -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]On = Behalf Of Greg Newell Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 6:19 PM To: Pianotech Subject: Re: D-C 25 watt rods =20 John, I looked at this somewhat differently than you describe below. I = am not looking at 25 watts as 25 BTU's but rather just how much energy = is being used by the rod. Since the short one and the long one use the = same amount of electricity but are in fact different in size they it = seems to follow that they would produce a different amount of heat. This = is where my idea of an imbalance comes in. Is my thinking correct here? Greg At 03:51 PM 2/13/2004, you wrote: Hi Greg, 25W concentrated in a short bar would feel hotter than, 25W in a long = bar. Just think, one has more area to heat, and greater dissipation, so feels = cooler. The shorter bar has the heat concentrated, and would feel = hotter. I saw a picture of an 8 cylinder motorcycle, it was the same engine as = powers some cars. I would think that as a motorcycle, it would appear to = have more power, than the same engine pushing a car. Best regards, John M. Ross Windsor, Nova Scotia, Canada jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca <mailto:jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca>=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Greg Newell <mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net> =20 To: Ruth Phillips <mailto:webb50@comcast.net> ; Pianotech = <mailto:pianotech@ptg.org> =20 Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 3:20 PM Subject: Re: D-C 25 watt rods Listers and Listees, Thank you for the feedback. While it is not as much discussion = as I had hoped it, I believe, had the desired result. While Ruth = Phillips mentions below that the 25Watt Rod was discontinued as a system = staple I have to disagree. The part number G6PS (top item on page 22 of = the Jansen catalogue includes both a 2' and a 4' 25 watt rod. I also = disagree with others that posted (Don I think it was) who said that the = two rods producing very different amounts of heat would not necessarily = produce an imbalance. I paraphrased to clarify my point but I can't see = how it could be anything but. Don's argument was that I did not take = into account convection currents. It would seem to me that if one was = too hot to hold and the other could be held all day being only luke warm = then any convection currents would be more in the category of WIND to = not produce an imbalance. I can agree with others who have posted that = they never noticed any problems. Neither have I. Even though the two = bars produce an entirely different amount of heat they are not = necessarily doing damage. It seems that it could certainly be said, = however, that they are not doing the best job possible. Any further = thoughts? Greg At 06:25 PM 2/11/2004, you wrote: Greg - the 25 watt rod was discontinued as a system staple long ago. =20 On the soundboard, once compression has taken place, drying the wood is = not going to make it disappear. When you install a system you will find = that the wood changes - that is about all you can say with certainty. = With the right equipment, properly installed, the system will stabilize = the wood. Once it stabilizes, you can make corrections based on what = you find at that point. It may take some time as there will be residual = change, such as there is when you change pitch. Every change causes = reactions, and you keep at it until the change is so miniscule that the = reaction is meaningless. I hope this helps to clarify what you found. Ruth Phillips =20 =20 Greg Newell Greg's piano Fort=E9 mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net=20 _____ =20 =20 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system ( http://www.grisoft.com = <http://www.grisoft.com/> ). Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/6/2004 _____ =20 _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system ( http://www.grisoft.com = <http://www.grisoft.com/> ). Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/6/2004 Greg Newell Greg's piano Fort=E9 mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/50/0d/37/d5/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC