This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Re: Plywood shrinkage??? Laminated soundboards???Hi Ron, Del, You're correct that the drawer bottom panels were not coated in any way, = and I suspect the original quality of the plywood was not as good as = what one has available today. (It's a bit hard to tell, considering the = age and deterioration of the plywood.) I'd say that the grain = orientation, at least on the outer laminates, is about the equivalent of = cheap hardware store variety material, on average. I'm just curious about the moisture blocking properties of the SB = finish: How much does the finish alter the rate of MC change in a SB? = I presume it depends on the type and thickness of finish used. Has = anyone done any side-by-side measurements? Back to the plywood... Regarding quality: Although the drawer bottoms may be constructed of = relatively poor quality material, I would strongly suspect only the best = materials are used in boat construction. In fact knowing some boating = enthusiasts, who pour unbelievable amounts of money into their surrogate = babies, I'd suspect the quality of these materials would rival what you = builders/rebuilders use! Furthermore, the reference to boat deck = plywood shrinkage is most likely with regard to modern-day materials. I suspect shrinkage may be the fate under extreme conditions. The boat = deck plywood obviously gets baked in the sun, doused with water, and so = forth. Drawer bottoms can frequently be wiped out with wet rags -- = which while not as extreme, still creates a rapid and drastic changes in = MC. Perhaps more importantly, another dynamic is going on in both these = cases. Deposition of water is never uniform, whether through leakage = past finish defects (boat) or through differential deposition of water = with a wet rag. This can cause a lot of internal stress and strain in = the panel. For instance, if a small spot in the center of a panel is = soaked with water,and the surrounding board remains dry, the swollen = center spot will be compressed within the "frame" of the surrounding = wood. This is actually how modern "door ding" removal is done in cars, = except with heat expansion, not moisture expansion. In the case of = metal door panels, it is a way to shrink the previously expanded metal = back to its original size. In the case of the plywood, the compressed = spot would dry out under tension, and when other parts of the panel = would later expend, the spot would gladly receed. I suspect this may be = the dynamic that results in the progressive shrinkage of these panels. = The difference may not be quality of plywood, so much as evenness of = moisture distribution. It would be very interesting to model this phenomenon with sheet metal = and a blow torch, producing overall shrinkage in the metal panel with = repeated application of heat in isolated spots throughout the panel. = Theoretically, would the panel eventually (after bizillions of years of = this sort of treatment) end up in a sphere? This is a very interesting phenomenon, to say the least! Peace, Sarah ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/21/4c/30/25/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC