Welcome back Ron! Care to share any of your experiences from the land down under? Greg Newell At 01:21 PM 7/27/2004, you wrote: >> In the case of the Mason AA which I started this thread discussing >> there is any reticence at least on my part to improve this piano. My >> only (major) limitation is the plate But which is also true of the old >> Stwy A being currently mentioned. I have reproduced one of those with >> the original bridge & string scale & with a really good board & bearing >> setup it was quite good. In retrospect though the next one will probably >> get a closer look in the modification dept. I'm not a fan of the three >> bridge config. > >I am, more and more, a big fan of the three bridge configuration. In fact, >if I were designing a new piano and could design a plate I wanted (rather >than working around the existing one), I'd still give first consideration >to using three bridges. The poor examples of three bridge configurations >we see aren't the result of using three bridges instead of two. They're >the result of poor scale AND soundboard design. Rather than trying to >tweak the existing scale on top of the original soundboard design, you >would be ahead building a board designed to accommodate the bridges >designed to accommodate the scale designed to accommodate the existing plate. > >There are at least two people posting to this list who do this sort of >re-design on a per-piano basis (as opposed to having a specifically >established template for every model of every manufacturer that ever >existed). Del is one, and I am another. But you knew that. > >Ron N > >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives Greg Newell Greg's piano Forté mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC