This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I've used both Tunelab & RCT and prefer Tunelab. Pitch-raises are accomplished faster with TL (IMO) by being able to see the pitch of individual strings of a unison without using mutes. I also like being able to set the type of real-world octaves I tune as 4-2 or 6-3, or whatever instead of the various "Octave tuning styles" that RCT uses. With TL, one can choose the sample notes used to create a tuning curve and then modify the resultant curve if desired. The split-scale mode often produces a useable tuning across bass/tenor breaks with large jumps in inharmonicity that would otherwise be impossible. In the low bass where some partials are difficult for the machine to hear, you can easily switch to another, more audible partial. You can also download and try the program before you buy it, and if you do buy it you save substantial $$. I haven't tried Verituner. Although it sounds like a great device I like having my schedule and complete customer database available to me on the same 7 oz Pocket PC that runs TL! - Mark -----Original Message----- From: Steve Martin [mailto:smartin@dodo.com.au] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:17 PM To: pianotech@ptg.org Subject: Electronic tuners!? Hello everyone i'd be almost sure that there is a thread somewhere in the archives regarding ETD's so can anyone point me to it or give me some current advice? I was thinking of buying probably the Cybertuner software - do any list members use this, are there any downfalls to the program and is there anything else comparable?? I have heard a lot of people talk very favourably about Cybertuner. thanks, Steve Martin. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/47/6a/a6/06/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC