This is a cheap Baldwin and it has those funky lobate knuckles that are integral with the shank. The shank flares at the flange end and doesn't fit into the Spurlock jig. I didn't want to chew up my jig to accommodate these odd-ball shanks. I've got the Spurlock key clamp. I'll use that and hit 'em w/ a coarse sander. I had not ever done it that way - thanks for the ideas guys. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "V T" <pianovt@yahoo.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 5:02 PM Subject: Tail Arcing > Hello Terry, > > Where are you having problems with the Spurlock > fixture? Is it at the hammer or the shank/flange end? > > I have very successfully used the fixture on Baldwin > parts and I prefer to do the arcing after the hammers > are glued to the shanks. I did make one modification > to the Spurlock fixture: I installed a set screw in > the shank channel to support the shank through its > entire length. Otherwise there were no problems. > > Vladan > > > > Anyone have any slick methods for arcing hammer tails > on a set that are = > already mounted on their shanks? I have, use, and like > the Spurlock tail = > arcing jig, but the hammer/shank assembly will not fit > into the jig.=20 > > This work is being done on an older good condition > Baldwin grand action = > that someone installed new hammers a few years ago, > but did not arc the = > tails. They are kinda squared-off. They do not check > well and they are = > attacking the new backchecks. The piano owner is not > interested in a new = > action, but rather to just try and make this one work > reasonably well. > > Thanks for any suggestions. > > Terry Farrell > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. > www.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC