---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Thanks, David, I LOVE it! :-) Fortunately, I have more to do than to keep track of how many OT posts someone makes! Avery At 08:38 AM 11/3/04, you wrote: >Dear ? > >A few questions. When you took leave of posting to the list, back in >June, (So Long From PianoTunaGuy), you stated that there were others who >had already broken through the generally accepted list-policy of signing >ones name. For my edification, would you indicate who those posters are? > >Second, while I agree that there has been a recent surge in discussion of >a few OT topics, you seemed to have missed the episode where we agreed to >indicate such in the subject heading, so that those uninterested in an >occasional digression could simply delete. This is going back now to at >least April of 2003. > >If you felt that, even with this provision, the OT was getting out of >control, you could have broached the subject in a much less offensive >manner. What was your purpose in listing the offenders "by name" and >frequency? Is 3 OT's an outrageous number, especially coming from the >contributors you have named? > >Your comment to Bob Hull (not Hulfam@) seems entirely inappropriate, in >both tone and content. > >Lastly, it's true we have agreed to try to keep politics off this list, >but there are times when real life imposes itself, even into our list >family here. Maybe political OT needs an extra layer of buffering, even >from more mundane OT. Perhaps if there were a political chat list, just >for PTG members, it could channel the need to express these real-life >concerns, without threatening the fundamental nature of this list. If >such a list existed as an option, I would be less tolerant of such >expressions appearing here, in normal times, however, as Dean May >indicated just now, these are not necessarily such times. > >Oh, one more thing. If, as you stated, you are just now checking in since >you left in June, > >>Checked in to pianotech today after awhile away. Glad to see that I >>haven't missed much, evidently. > >I'd day you missed plenty. > >David Skolnik >Hastings on Hudson > > > >At 08:09 AM 11/3/2004 -0500, you wrote: >>Dear List >> >>Checked in to pianotech today after awhile away. Glad to see that I >>haven't missed much, evidently. Here's an exit poll for you all: >> >>OTs: 37 >> >>piano related posts: 3 >> >>Unbelievable. Another landslide victory for those of you intent on >>ruining this list. It used to be just a few posters inundating the >>list with BS, but now it seems to be a collective effort. >> >>Here are the leaders: >>alpha88X@aol.com 2 OTs >>avery@ev1.net 3 OTs >>deanmay@piano... 2 OTs >>erwinspiano@aol.com 3 OTs >>ilvey@sbcglobal... 2 OTs >>joegarret@earthlink 2 OTs >>john@mussellwhite.... 3 OTs >>mfarrel@tampabay... 2 OTs >>piannaman@aol.com 3 OTs >> >>Good job to all of you. And hullfam5@yahoo.com, get on the >>stick! What's this crap about "humidity level for conditioning new >>pinblock"? Find another list, man! >> >>PianoTunaGuy ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c7/f7/39/bc/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC