Which brings up my next question: To increase stiffness, why not "beef up" the ribs, instead of shortening them with cutoffs and such ? That way you would preserve soundboard area, and still avoid "bridge collapse". This Packard I'm working on has NO cutoffs, but VERY "beefy" ribs----- and still sounds GREAT after 80 years, with loads of actual water damage to the board, and about a dozen cracks. Thump --- Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net> wrote: > > > > >When the pulse from the string hits the bridge and > >therefore the soundboard, it travels in the board > >until it gets to a place on the board that no > longer................. > > ------------------------------------- > > It is intended to reduce soundboard area behind the > treble bridge and > shorten the ribs. With both a fish and a bass > cutoff, the ribs through the > killer octave are shortened too, and a more uniform > progression of rib > length (and stiffness control) is obtained from > tenor to treble. > > Ron N > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: > https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC