Shorten the ribs....or make them stauncher?

gordon stelter lclgcnp@yahoo.com
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:27:44 -0800 (PST)


Which brings up my next question: To increase
stiffness, why not "beef up" the ribs, instead of
shortening them with cutoffs and such ?  That way you
would preserve soundboard area, and still avoid
"bridge collapse".  This Packard I'm working on has NO
cutoffs, but VERY "beefy" ribs----- and still sounds
GREAT after 80 years, with loads of actual water
damage to the board, and about a dozen cracks.
     Thump

 
--- Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net> wrote:

> 
> >
> >When the pulse from the string hits the bridge and
> >therefore the soundboard, it travels in the board
> >until it gets to a place on the board that no
> longer.................
> 
> -------------------------------------
> 
> It is intended to reduce soundboard area behind the
> treble bridge and 
> shorten the ribs. With both a fish and a bass
> cutoff, the ribs through the 
> killer octave are shortened too, and a more uniform
> progression of rib 
> length (and stiffness control) is obtained from
> tenor to treble.
> 
> Ron N
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info:
> https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC