Rib crowning & compression failure

Bec and John bjsilva001@comcast.net
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:23:57 -0500


Hi Thump,

> while producing pianos that
> seem to bear little change due to scientific scrutiny
> --- from what they were in 1888!

See, this doesn't bother me at all. Not to suggest modern pianos can't 
be made better, but we live in a culture that assumes newer technology 
must be better, which I do not agree with. Look at modern buildings 
compared to the old buildings and churches in Europe - nowadays we 
rarely (if ever!) make anything nearly as wonderful. But hey, we're 
more "advanced" now and we use computers.

I would even dare to say that our current society is so influenced by 
our money-obsessed business model that quality has suffered, so I will 
usually lean more on the side of things were made better in the past.

- John


> Dear Mr. Brekne,
>     With all due respect: it is not the fact that
> Steinway produces some very enjoyable pianos that is
> being criticised. It is the fact that they seem to
> "rest on their laurels", and bask in the lucrative,
> idolatrous adulation that is heaped upon them by much
> of the planet's populace, while producing pianos that
> seem to bear little change due to scientific scrutiny
> --- from what they were in 1888!
>      Also: Other fine pianos have come and gone: some,
> in many ways, superior --- only to be quashed by the
> marketing Juggernaut of S$Sons, N.Y.!
>      And those vanquished pianos often take their
> secrets of construction with them. it is that which we
> despise. ANYONE who thinks they are above improvement
> is, by nature, reprehensible!
>      Thump


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC