---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I see no difference in your statement and mine. (?) The fudging comment would apply as in the following examples: Hammers are sluggush and or too loose (add time); inexperienced tech doing the job with instruction manuals laid out all about him (charge no more than the guide time, even if it takes you a month); action has received regular attention by competent tech (estimate/charge charge less than the guide); can of Pepsi spilled into the action (add lots of time); rabid wombat died in the action cavity three weeks ago (decline the job, or refer it to a Piano Wombat Specialist PWS). Alan Barnard Salem, Missouri ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe Garrett To: pianotech Sent: 06/26/2005 1:44:39 PM Subject: Re: Grand Regulation Alan Barnard said: " This is based on the time an average experienced tech can do an average job, etc., so might be fudged for special circumstances." Alan, INCORRECT! Obviously, you didn't read all of the RLG!<G> All times are based on an AVERAGE between skilled technicians and the Olde Apprentices level of competance. Regards, Joe Garrett, R.P.T. Captain, Tool Police Squares R I ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/41/3a/97/72/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC