Uh, 2 bps for 4ths? Isn't that a tad zippy? Alan Barnard Salem, Missouri > [Original Message] > From: David Andersen <david@davidandersenpianos.com> > To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org> > Date: 05/03/2005 12:03:54 AM > Subject: Re: Sanderson Temperament > > > Here's the answer I wish I had given you when you were inquiring > > about how to hit 7 bps in the F3-A3 M3rd. The same answer applies > > here: Remember that tuning through a temperament sequence need not > > yield perfect results. It only need get you close enough so that you > > can use the refinement techniques, mainly the inverse beat > > relationships of the 4ths and 5ths. If you tune through the sequence > > within a couple cents, you should have few expanded 5ths or > > contracted 4ths, and checking the 4ths and 5ths can get you the rest > > of the way to a great temperament. > > > > Kent > > > Great job, Kent; exactly my thinking, except I basically tune right from the > start with 4ths and 5ths; they're very easy for me to hear, and if all the > 4ths are beating a slow wow-wow-wow-wow, around 2 bps, and the fifths are > nearly pure, not really beating at all, there's an ideal ET. All the 3rds > and 6ths checks work exactly, including contiguous 3rds. There's the > illusion of little or no movement in the 1-5-1 or 1-4-1 triad--- (in my > temperament, F3 to F4.) Working with open strings is much more realistic > than working with a temperament strip, IMO; 3 strings certainly SEEM to beat > differently, and fit into tests differently,than one string. > > David A. > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC