On May 3, 2005, at 12:36 PM, David Love wrote: > While this may work well in practice, it might be a tad zippy for the > RPT test. Maybe that's one problem with the set up of the test. It > doesn't tolerate different tuning styles that well. The tolerances in > the temperament octave are fairly small and a 2bps fourth may be > pushing > the envelope. Not if it's within a uniformly wide test tuning. It is true that most master tunings are conservatively narrow, but aural verification is real. The scoring of the examinee's tuning against the master tuning is just a raw score, nothing more. No points are actually deducted until the examiners have heard the tuning error with their own ears. This means if an examinee comes in and tunes wide, he may do fine on the exam if his chromatic intervals progress smoothly, thanks to aural verification. Indeed, I know of a tuning exam where the examinee thought that the examiners _wanted_ a wide tuning, so that is what he tuned. The raw score showed him failing, but after aural verification, he had actually passed at the CTE level. Kent
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC